Corvette C3 Forum 1968 through 1982

Im loosing my mind on this one.

  #1  
Old 10-09-2010, 01:11 AM
terl30's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6
Default Im loosing my mind on this one.

here is my question, does this sound like it should be a descent combination for some power. in my 74vette i have...a gmpp 350 short block,edelbrock performer rpm cam,gmpp vortec heads,edelbrock performer rpm intake,holley 600 street avenger carb,crane blue full roller rocker arms,converted heads to screw in studs,hooker super comp long tube header going back to pair of flow master 40 series,B&M 3000 stall,rebuild 400 turbo,4.56 gears i just picked this up from shop on friday after months of being their and i ask shouldnt this combination at least be able to break the rear tires loose? does not feel any more powerful then did before though i am now out 5k. unsure where to go from here the only items that reused of mine were the carb(basically new when i brought it in) and mr gasket 12s electic fuel pump. is this a lost cause or am i missing something obvious.
 
  #2  
Old 10-09-2010, 09:44 PM
partsman41's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Battle Mtn NV
Posts: 337
Default

Without the numbers on the cam and some of the other stuff i'm only guessing here but............................. Possibly you've built an engine with an awesome top end and only moderate low end. Your carb sounds good for low end but some of the other stuff sounds more like higher rpm. Does it really wake up when you spin it a little? Like maybe 5 grand on up?
 
  #3  
Old 10-09-2010, 11:05 PM
terl30's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6
Default

cam specs are
Basic Operating RPM Range 1,500-6,500
Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift 234
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift 244
Duration at 050 inch Lift 234 int./244 exh.
Advertised Intake Duration 308
Advertised Exhaust Duration 318
Advertised Duration 308 int./318 exh.
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.488 in.

less then 500 miles on it so i gotta take it easy. but cruising at 50mph pulls almost 4500rpm. i know not good for a break in. but i did hammer it once off the line and got nothing would not even break back tires loose i figured with that 4.56 rear it shouldnt be a problem. trying to figure out where i went wrong on this engine i thought for once i did everything right. To be honest my wife has an 02 WS6 and my only goal is to finally beat her i cant put into words how this irratates me, i worked on this car to get it perfect for 8 years she gets the trans am and kills me with the ac on and radio playing.
 
  #4  
Old 10-12-2010, 06:09 PM
Texas Jim's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 527
Default

I think the super comp headers probably have big tubes, like 1 3/4 or 1 7/8", too big f/ the components. Also, 4:56 gears would work w/ a big block, but are too much f/ a small block. The engine is probably almost wound out by the time you hit the gas. But it should run alittle. Maybe the valve adj. or timing...?
 
  #5  
Old 10-13-2010, 02:02 PM
partsman41's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Battle Mtn NV
Posts: 337
Default

Everything looks reasonable so you should be able to spin the tires pretty good. I agree w/Jim the headers are probably costing you low end torque.The 600 cfm carb will hurt your top end but not until 6 grand or so. The 3 grand converter should get you above where the headers are holding you back. The only time I have seen a situation like your is when the guy had the cam a couple of teeth off,the thing started and ran good,just didn't make any power. That's pretty tough to check w/o pulling the timing cover. Did your mech degree the cam? That's pretty much essential for what you're doing. Only other things I can think of would be ignition timing or the valves set way too tight as Jim suggested.
I would think a 4.56 would be more likely too much for a big block and pretty much spot on for a smallblock unless you wanted to run 4.88's or 5.12's. I ran a 327 with a 3 speed in front of 4.56's in a 3000 lb Studebaker and won a stoplight grand prix or two back in the 60's.
Please let us know what you find out!
Ron
 
  #6  
Old 10-13-2010, 06:49 PM
SCHOON's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Flemington, NJ
Posts: 544
Default

Hi,
I have almost the same set up in my 74 except I have a 4speed with a 3:36 rear.
You should be able tear the tires off you Vet with that rear.
I will say this my Vet ran like crap until I found the Vac leak and then set the timing right.
The difference was like night and day.
The vac leak was internal, bad manifold causing me to run lean plus my timing was at 10 instead of 8. Another thing to ckeck if you have electronic ignition your plugs should be gapped at 41 not 35.
Doesn't take much to lose power.
Good luck,
Schoon
 
  #7  
Old 10-14-2010, 10:57 AM
Texas Jim's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 527
Default

I'd say that the last two replies are correct, something like the timing, vacuum leak, etc. Ofcourse all the vitals need to be checked, to include reading the plugs, so that anything major should be taken care of first and then tune-up and so on... The car should run pretty well w/ what you have in it. But I have to say that, again, those are big gears f/ a small block in that 'Vette. If you're speaking 1/8 mile, then the 4:56 ratio would be the one, or very close. But f/ a (approx.) 1/4 mile, those gears are too big. The shorter stroke in the small block, as opposed to a big block, will allow you to make quicker hp, w/ those gears, you're up to the red-line f/ your cam super quick, and in a 1/4 mile, I'd say that you're wound out before the line comes up f/ you. If you had a 4 speed (over drive) automatic, then those gears would work better. I know that 6500 rpm comes quick in that car. w/ those gears. And the suggestion f/ a bigger carb IMO was correct also, and IMO an intake w/ it. What exactly are you setting the car up to do? ie; 1/4 mile or 1/8 mile? I'd say though, it sounds like you have quite a car, and w/ all you've done, and w/ the small things ironed out, I'm sure that it'll run great. I'm in NO WAY knocking your car, just don't know what you're setting it up for. Good Luck and please keep us posted.
 
  #8  
Old 10-15-2010, 06:49 AM
SCHOON's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Flemington, NJ
Posts: 544
Default

I am thinking 3:73 gears would work best for you.
I have 4:10 gears and I am red lining just before I finish the 1/4

Schoon
 
  #9  
Old 10-15-2010, 07:55 AM
C3 Starship's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Reno, Nv.
Posts: 5,244
Default

I agree, it depends on what your driving demands are.
In my case I have a "long range bomber". LOL
I have 3.07s, 70 mph at 2400 to 2600 rpm.
Installed the 3 sp stick w/ overdrive.
My engine is built for mid to high rpm power band.
 
  #10  
Old 10-16-2010, 09:43 AM
Texas Jim's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 527
Default

Originally Posted by C3 Starship
I agree, it depends on what your driving demands are.
In my case I have a "long range bomber". LOL
I have 3.07s, 70 mph at 2400 to 2600 rpm.
Installed the 3 sp stick w/ overdrive.
My engine is built for mid to high rpm power band.


Yes, I seem to remember that you have one of those engines that you had to grease the sides of to drop it into the engine compartment. LOL! You know, even w/ my 'Vette having the 350 and w/ the smog pump and lines removed, I still find that the easiest way to change the plugs is "4 from the bottom and 4 from the top." A big block in that same compartment trips me out, as the amount of clearance is next to nothing.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Im loosing my mind on this one.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM.