Ricers Copying the real "Hot Rods"
#21
03-28-2007, 05:07 AM
RE: Ricers Copying the real "Hot Rods"
By the way your 107 hp per liter engine. Is it on stock internals by stock I mean not forgedinternals? If so the engine will be rebuilt every 8-10k miles, sounds fun.
#22
03-28-2007, 05:08 AM
RE: Ricers Copying the real "Hot Rods"
Whos going in a straight line? Im lowered and have suspension upgrades galore; I bet I have more into my suspension than your whole car is worth. By the way the C6 Z was faster around the Nuremberg ring than your precious honduh nsx I mean Acura sorry..... PS thats not a straight line.
The Honda NSX-R ran the Nürburgring in 7:56 minutes.
The C6 Z06 ran the same track in 7:42. That's a 7L V8 up against a 3.2L V6, and thats all it can beat it by? Not to mention the fact that Honda started and has been using the same technology in the NSX since 1990. It took Chevy till 2006 to beat it. The C5 Z06 ran the track in the same time as the NSX-R, 7:56.
#23
03-28-2007, 05:11 AM
RE: Ricers Copying the real "Hot Rods"
ORIGINAL: sixfiveoh
Oh is that so? Well since you brought up the NSX, let's do a little bit of checking our statements.
The Honda NSX-R ran the Nürburgring in 7:56 minutes.
The C6 Z06 ran the same track in 7:42. That's a 7L V8 up against a 3.2L V6, and thats all it can beat it by? Not to mention the fact that Honda started and has been using the same technology in the NSX since 1990. It took Chevy till 2006 to beat it. The C5 Z06 ran the track in the same time as the NSX-R, 7:56.
Whos going in a straight line? Im lowered and have suspension upgrades galore; I bet I have more into my suspension than your whole car is worth. By the way the C6 Z was faster around the Nuremberg ring than your precious honduh nsx I mean Acura sorry..... PS thats not a straight line.
The Honda NSX-R ran the Nürburgring in 7:56 minutes.
The C6 Z06 ran the same track in 7:42. That's a 7L V8 up against a 3.2L V6, and thats all it can beat it by? Not to mention the fact that Honda started and has been using the same technology in the NSX since 1990. It took Chevy till 2006 to beat it. The C5 Z06 ran the track in the same time as the NSX-R, 7:56.
#26
03-28-2007, 05:15 AM
RE: Ricers Copying the real "Hot Rods"
Do you know anything about vettes? Show me a low miles 2004 through 2005 that is going for half price. ****, I guess I can get a c6z in 2 years for 35k.
#27
03-28-2007, 05:17 AM
RE: Ricers Copying the real "Hot Rods"
ORIGINAL: chargedvette02
Lets throw price in there to cool guy did you forget about that?!!!!! C6Z 65 - 70k NSX hmmmmmmmmmmmm hahahahahaha 90-100k. That gets you 252 whp though lmao. So 100 grand for 90's technology wow what a great buy.
ORIGINAL: sixfiveoh
Oh is that so? Well since you brought up the NSX, let's do a little bit of checking our statements.
The Honda NSX-R ran the Nürburgring in 7:56 minutes.
The C6 Z06 ran the same track in 7:42. That's a 7L V8 up against a 3.2L V6, and thats all it can beat it by? Not to mention the fact that Honda started and has been using the same technology in the NSX since 1990. It took Chevy till 2006 to beat it. The C5 Z06 ran the track in the same time as the NSX-R, 7:56.
Whos going in a straight line? Im lowered and have suspension upgrades galore; I bet I have more into my suspension than your whole car is worth. By the way the C6 Z was faster around the Nuremberg ring than your precious honduh nsx I mean Acura sorry..... PS thats not a straight line.
The Honda NSX-R ran the Nürburgring in 7:56 minutes.
The C6 Z06 ran the same track in 7:42. That's a 7L V8 up against a 3.2L V6, and thats all it can beat it by? Not to mention the fact that Honda started and has been using the same technology in the NSX since 1990. It took Chevy till 2006 to beat it. The C5 Z06 ran the track in the same time as the NSX-R, 7:56.
PS. Honda's are slow.
#28
03-28-2007, 05:17 AM
RE: Ricers Copying the real "Hot Rods"
ORIGINAL: sixfiveoh
Please find me a 1990-1995 NSX for 90k - 100k you ignorant ****.
Please find me a 1990-1995 NSX for 90k - 100k you ignorant ****.
#29
03-28-2007, 05:17 AM
RE: Ricers Copying the real "Hot Rods"
Here, I'm not sure if I'm having trouble reading, but I don't see anything above 60k?
http://motors.search.ebay.com/nsx_Ca...chiZQQsaprcloZ
http://motors.search.ebay.com/nsx_Ca...chiZQQsaprcloZ
#30
03-28-2007, 05:18 AM
RE: Ricers Copying the real "Hot Rods"
Lets throw price in there to cool guy did you forget about that?!!!!! C6Z 65 - 70k NSX hmmmmmmmmmmmm hahahahahaha 90-100k. That gets you 252 whp though lmao. So 100 grand for 90's technology wow what a great buy.